paper on mills -- essays research papers

I decided to write my paper on submarine sandwich for two main reasons. The first deals with delight and virtue and his take on these things. I would first off care to state my dis tot upments with his ideas and at that placefore I will speak of my agreements.Mill cont checks that a less intelligent private can non be as happy as unity with a greater intellectual capacity. He also states that you would not be happy as swine even if everything you desired was given. I disagree. I touch sensation that if you do not know of what you do not have hence you cannot miss it. If we were less intelligent then we would be much guinea pig with the more primal need that our ancestors had. If their needs were met then they were happy. Can we cite the same for ourselves? Even if I had everything I ever wanted I could not be as happy as a solitary who had a mate, expert hunting grounds and a full stomach. They had no one to worry about except protecting their clan. Yet we as a more civilized culture have much more to concern ourselves with. We must not only worry about ourselves and our families scarcely also our neighbors and communities. If a cave existence was considered virtuous it was because he was a wide-cut protector and provider and could be relied upon by his clan, yet for a man to now be considered virtuous it takes almost the same but this design is much harder to achieve.I do feel like Mill that to tolerate virtuously is a goal that we should all strive to attain and like him I believe that these acts will not bring about happiness as an end but by acting in such(prenominal) a manner will contribute to your overall happiness exponentially. I also like the fact that that if something should bring about your happiness then it is ok to try and achieve it such as funds. He does not enunciate it is wrong to try and get as much coin as you can and he consecrates it is ok if it is a means to an end for bringing you happiness. Money will buy many o f our desires and wishes and for many it is there main goal in life and yet for others obtaining the money itself is there goal. That alone will bring them happiness as it is there brainish force and having enough will satisfy them. This in many make will make the person noxious to others but not always. We should tincture at this then that to try and achieve a lot of money but not become noxious and still trying to bouncy virtuously would be accept suitable. That is not necessarily everyones goal who hopes to acquire... ... say I do not care if my child is sick and needs to go to the doctor I want a new couple up of shoes and do not have enough money to do both? No it is unthought-of (At least for those with any morals or virtues). These are simple to deduct but what about when we face measure of war? Who decides who is sacrificed then? Is it right of them to make such decisions? I say yes. If we have placed these people in a position of assurance then they have that right because we have placed our trust in them to act in a manner that will be for the good of our community. It then becomes our right to make this sacrifice. If we do not then soul else must take our place. Then we have not only acted falsely but we have shirked our duty to our community and placed someone elses life at risk for our own cowardice or selfishness. therefore the good of the community should be sacrificed for, and those in charge should be able to make those decisions based on the trust we placed in them when they acquire those positions.I will sum this up by stating that living virtuously, chastely and by willing to sacrifice for the greater good sum up most of Mills philosophy all of which I agree with wholeheartedly.