Plato and Aristotle: An Analysis Essay

Determining the beat inning of policy-making association was important to the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and each of them ushered his spirit in important works such as the nation and governance. In explaining, comparing, and contrasting the policy-making philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, it is evident that each of them divided the selfsame(prenominal) aim of identifying and promoting the high hat form of political government. They in like manner sh bed in communal the same philosophy regarding the origins of a political posit. The State arises, Plato says through Socrates in the democracy, out of the needs of man broad. (Plato) Aristotle accepts, and declares that the state is a political partnership that exists for purposes of autonomy as well as for the sake of living well. In opposite words, the State exists in order to provide for the well-being of its citizens. Aristotle expresses this in Politics when he argues, the good animation is t he purpose of the city-state. (Aristotle) Furthermore, both Aristotle and Plato agreed that gentleman is by nature a political animal, because he has the ability to express his thoughts about justice.Their respective analyses reflected their respect for justice, and their elevation of it to the highest priority. In the Republic, Plato defines just political regulate as a system in which each cheer is satisfied to the proper extent and everyone has what is theirs. The philosophers bring on the knowledge they want the warriors have the honors they want and the commoners have the goods and pleasures they want, under the enlightened guidance of philosophers and warriors. The methods of Aristotle and Plato were same in m whatsoever ways.They both utilized logic, evaluations of contemporary politics, and lengthy comparisons of various types of political rule to arrive at their conclusions. As citizens of ancient Greece, they both shared much the same outlook on society, religion, e xampleity, and politics. They as well as shared similar historical perspectives, and their perceptions of contemporary events were formed through the same philosophical context. angiotensin converting enzyme of the contrasts between their methods is that Plato used analogies to make his points.He examined a political state by comparing the state with the human soul. Unlike Aristotle, he also used a style of approach in which he do his points through dialogues involving Socrates. He also designed an ideal state widen by battalion he referred to as The Guardians which differed from Aristotles approach in Politics, in which style and form more closely resembled an essay or monologue. In Politics, Aristotle emphasized that correct political rule involves pursuing policies which are to the common advantage of the most people.Aristotle reasoned that rulers who placed their own interests in a higher place everyone elses had no political legitimacy, for their tyranny brought suffering upon their own people. Aristotle exposit the best forms of political rule as kingship, aristocracy and polity, and described the strike forms as tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. Plato was also harshly critical of tyranny, and described it in the Republic as, not a matter of minor theft and violence, but of sell plunder, sacred and profane, private or public. (Plato) Both mens methods come to a comprehensive analysis of the consequences of each form of rule.Aristotle criticized Democracy because its consequences were rule by the multitude, which causes injustice. He criticized Oligarchy because its consequences were rule by the wealthinessy, which also causes injustice and he criticized Tyranny because its consequences were dictatorship, which again causes injustice. In terms of the merits of the citizenry, Aristotle notes that the people may collectively be the best judges of certain things, so it is justified for them to wee part in deliberations. But like Plato, he feels that the common people are not qualified to share in the highest big businessmans.Both Plato and Aristotle also agree that laws need to be made in accordance with the regime, and agree that the more just a ruler is, the more just the laws ordain be. Essentially, both Aristotle and Plato asserted that the goal of politics should be justice. One departure between them is that Plato believed that the best claim to rule was education and virtue, although he conceded that at that place is also a claim to rule based on wealth and on numbers. Another difference is that Aristotle emphasized that the most important travail for a leader was to be a lawgiver, and to frame the appropriate arrangement for the city-state.In Aristotles system, it was the leaders duty to provide brook laws, customs, and institutions for the citizens. According to Aristotle, once the brass was in place, the ruler needed to claim the necessary steps to maintain it, to implement reforms when he considered th em necessary, and to guard against any subversion of the political system. Aristotles emphasis on a makeup sets him apart from Plato, who considered philosopher kingship the best form of political rule. Aristotle described a constitution as a certain ordering of the inhabitants of the city-state, and as the way of manners of the citizens.(Aristotle) He also speaks of the constitution of a community as the form of the compound and argues that whether the community is the same over time depends on whether it has the same constitution. (Aristotle) It should be noted that despite the fact that Aristotles political views were influenced by Plato, he was very critical of the ideal city-state set forth in Platos Republic. He based his criticism on the grounds that Platos ideal city-state overvalued political unity, embraced a system of communism that was impractical and hostile to human nature, and neglected the happiness of the individual citizens.In contrast, in Aristotles view of the ideal State each and every citizen would possess moral virtue and the equipment to carry it out in practice, and thereby attain a life of excellence and complete happiness. All of the citizens would hold political office and possess private property because one should call the city-state happy not by looking at a part of it but at all the citizens. (Aristotle) In conclusion, the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle were both concerned with identifying and promoting the best form of political association.In works such as the Republic and Politics, they used similar methods of analysis to evaluate the best form of political rule. For Aristotle, the best form of political rule corresponded to the best way of life for a human being. Since the best way of life is living nobly and according to virtue, the best political form of rule is the one which promotes this kind of life. For Plato, the best form of political rule was Aristocracy, for it involves rule by the best people i n the political community. Bibliography Aristotle. Politics. New York Dover Publications, 2000. Plato. Republic. New York Viking Press, 1955.